I just want to note this here about spectrums, after it came up on facebook.
A friend shared this article recently, summed up by this meme:
This spurred quite a lengthy conversation, after one of her friends took great issue with handling depressed individuals with kid gloves, among other things. I’ve just read about the dangers of handling people of any stripe with kid gloves (fascinating read; focused on college students, but I’m sure you can see the translation to nearly any population), which I saw the point of. However, I’ve also been depressed and had to weather the ceaseless “Why?” storm, so I let these two percolate in the back of my mind, as I do.
For now, this is what I’ve concluded.
Many things in life are getting eroded of their value – migraines are my favorite example of this. Migraines are considered merely “bad headaches” by many, for example. Migraines and headaches are two entirely different things, as anyone who’s ever actually had a migraine – and most people who’ve even so much as seen someone else suffer from a migraine – can attest. Headaches themselves come in a variety of guises: there are mild, moderate, severe; there are different sorts that feel different (tension, sinus, dehydration, etc). There’s a whole spectrum of them. But we don’t, in common parlance, say “I have a really severe tension headache.” Too many of us choose instead to say, “I have a migraine,” even though that’s wrong. So it gets stuck in common knowledge as “really severe headache = migraine.”
Likewise, I think we’ve had the same thing happen with “depression”. Somehow, we’ve tacked depression onto the sadness spectrum, so “depression” has become “very sad” to many people. It is not.
That said, since this is what’s embedded in our cultures, I think what happens is the automatic, unthinking response to the “I’m depressed” revelation has become “Why?” — because sadness has a cause, so therefore if you’re “very sad”, then that has a cause, too.
For example:
- Your loved one dies
- You don’t win the raffle or the lottery
- Your place of employment goes out of business, and you lose a job you love
- You have a crappy holiday
- You have a fight with a friend
- You lose a friend
- You lose out on the house you wanted to buy because the chain fell through
- You aren’t pregnant this month (but maybe next month)
- You can’t afford to see a group you like in concert when they come through your town; etc.
These are all causes of sadness, which will last for awhile, and then go away. Some will last longer than others; some will be felt more deeply than others; thus, sadness has a range, a spectrum. But instead of settling for “a little sad”, “moderately sad”, “really sad”, “deeply sad”, etc, we throw “depressed” in there, as though it belongs. It doesn’t.
Anyone who’s had any kind of brush with depression (in whatever capacity) knows that depression is an entirely different beast than sadness. There often isn’t a why, or a straightforward why. It’s not the stuff for a casual conversation with your friend who’s only treating it as another verbal handshake ((Verbal handshakes are those things you just automatically say, like “How are you?” “Good, you?” and “Cold, isn’t it?” “Aye, but at least it’s not raining.” These things that we don’t give thought to before, during, or after.)) — it’s the stuff for sussing out with someone who’s trained in depression.
The healthy mind’s verbal handshake, or throwaway comment, is the remark that the depressed mind might obsess over for days. “Am I really depressed? Am I just using this as an excuse for being lazy? I don’t know why I’m depressed…” It’s perfectly normal to not know what tangled mess is going on that’s wrought the depression – it’s not something as simple as your puppy having died, or else that’d be sadness. But the more we keep asking this ridiculous “Why?”, the more we keep alive the myth that it is something simple, that depression is a form of sadness — and the more we keep people from getting the help they need.
Very good post on the seriousness of depression SJ. Also the erosion of things in life, specifically migraines, was right on. It would be good if people didn’t have so many verbal handshakes but asked such things and really cared about your reply.
Thanks, Dad.
Well, verbal handshakes do serve a purpose – you can’t get into things deeply all the time with everyone, or you’ll wear yourself out and run out of time quickly! So it’s good to just quickly say hi in passing; it’s better than silently passing. I’ll see a friend next week for lunch, and when she asks me how I am, she’ll want to know the deep down, true answer, with all the nuances; when I see her the next day in the midst of the crowded room at WI, neither one of us will want to go into all of that in that environment.
It’s just that we can’t survive solely off verbal handshakes. I don’t think we can survive without them – either with nothing in their place, or with only deep, meaningful conversation in their place. But we can’t survive without the deep conversation, either. We need a mix of quiet time to reflect, verbal handshakes to keep gently in touch, and deep conversation to truly stimulate. Unfortunately, I think too few people get enough deep conversation. :-\